ହାତଲେଖା ପରଖ

Tofazzal {prettyurl|Graphology}}

ହାତଲେଖା ପରଖ ଏକ ଭ୍ରମବୈଜ୍ଞାନିକ^[୧]^[୨]^[୩]^[୪]^[୫]^[୬] ପଢ଼ା ଏବଂ ବିଶ୍ଳେଷଣ ଯାହା ହାତଲେଖାକୁ, ବିଶେଷ କରି ମଣିଷର ମାନସିକତାକୁ ନେଇ କରାଯାଇଥାଏ । ଡାକ୍ତରୀ ବିଜ୍ଞାନରେ, ଏହା ମସ୍ତିଷ୍କ ଓ ସ୍ନାୟୁ ତନ୍ତ୍ରରେ ଥିବା ରୋଗ ଗୁଡ଼ିକୁ ହାତଲେଖା ମାଧ୍ୟମରେ ପରଖିବାରେ ସାହାଯ୍ୟ କରିଥାଏ । The term is sometimes incorrectly used to refer to forensic document examination.

ଟୀକା

↑ "Barry Beyerstein Q&A". Ask the Scientists. Scientific American Frontiers. Archived from the original on 2008-02-14. Retrieved 2008-02-22. "they simply interpret the way we form these various features on the page in much the same way ancient oracles interpreted the entrails of oxen or smoke in the air. I.e., it's a kind of magical divination or fortune telling where 'like begets like.'"
↑ "The use of graphology as a tool for employee hiring and evaluation". British Columbia Civil Liberties Association. 1988. Archived from the original on 2008-02-17. Retrieved 2008-02-22. "On the other hand, in properly controlled, blind studies, where the handwriting samples contain no content that could provide non-graphological information upon which to base a prediction (e.g., a piece copied from a magazine), graphologists do no better than chance at predicting the personality traits"
↑ entry in The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience.
↑ Thomas, John A. (2002). "Graphology Fact Sheet". North Texas Skeptics. Retrieved 2008-02-22. "In summary, then, it seems that graphology as currently practiced is a typical pseudoscience and has no place in character assessment or employment practice. There is no good scientific evidence to justify its use, and the graphologists do not seem about to come up with any."
↑ James, Barry (3 August 1993). "Graphology Is Serious Business in France : You Are What You Write?". New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 May 2013. Retrieved 18 September 2010.
↑ Frazier, Kendrick (November/December 1998). "Science and Reason, Foibles and Fallacies, and Doomsdays". Skeptical Enquirer. Committee for Skeptical Enquiry. pp. Volume 22.6. Retrieved 18 September 2010. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

[Graph_Beyer_PBS-1] "Barry Beyerstein Q&A". Ask the Scientists. Scientific American Frontiers. Archived from the original on 2008-02-14. Retrieved 2008-02-22. "they simply interpret the way we form these various features on the page in much the same way ancient oracles interpreted the entrails of oxen or smoke in the air. I.e., it's a kind of magical divination or fortune telling where 'like begets like.'"

[Graph_BCCLA-2] "The use of graphology as a tool for employee hiring and evaluation". British Columbia Civil Liberties Association. 1988. Archived from the original on 2008-02-17. Retrieved 2008-02-22. "On the other hand, in properly controlled, blind studies, where the handwriting samples contain no content that could provide non-graphological information upon which to base a prediction (e.g., a piece copied from a magazine), graphologists do no better than chance at predicting the personality traits"

[[s]-3] try in The Skeptic Encyclopedia of Pseudoscience.

[Graph_NT-4] Thomas, John A. (2002). "Graphology Fact Sheet". North Texas Skeptics. Retrieved 2008-02-22. "In summary, then, it seems that graphology as currently practiced is a typical pseudoscience and has no place in character assessment or employment practice. There is no good scientific evidence to justify its use, and the graphologists do not seem about to come up with any."

[NYT1-5] James, Barry (3 August 1993). "Graphology Is Serious Business in France : You Are What You Write?". New York Times. Archived from the original on 17 May 2013. Retrieved 18 September 2010.

[skepticenq-6] Frazier, Kendrick (November/December 1998). "Science and Reason, Foibles and Fallacies, and Doomsdays". Skeptical Enquirer. Committee for Skeptical Enquiry. pp. Volume 22.6. Retrieved 18 September 2010. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

[୧]

[୨]

[୩]

[୪]

[୫]

[୬]